Students’ Perceptions in Learning English Tenses by Using YouTube
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59890/ijsr.v4i4.9Keywords:
YouTube, Students, Tenses, English, LearningAbstract
Grammar serves as the core framework of language proficiency, where the incorrect usage of tenses can lead to systematic breakdowns in communication, especially for academic purposes. The research instrument that was used in this study was a semi-structured interview guide. Samples of this research was seven eighth-semester English Language Education students at Dayanu Ikhsanuddin University in their efforts to learn english tenses by using YouTube. The techniques of data collection in this research aimed to obtain in-depth and accurate information. Result of this research that students have a positive perception of learning English tenses using YouTube. This study shows that YouTube helps students understand tenses more easily through clear explanations, examples, audio, and visual presentations. that YouTube provides flexible learning.
References
Alauddin, M. F., Anjani, B. S., & Sofi. (2023). Junior high school students' perceptions of learning tenses through the TikTok application. ELTICS: Journal of English Language Teaching and English Linguistics,8(1), 58-70.
Anderson,T. (2008). The theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed,), AU Press.
Anggrarini, & Faturokhman. (2021). The use of YouTube in English learning.
Arsyad, A. (2017). Media pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers. Azar, B. S. (2007). Traditional, rule-isolated grammar instruction.
Azar,B. S. (2003). Fundamentals of English grammar (3rd ed.,). Longman:
Berk, R. A. (2009). Multimedia teaching with video clips: TV, movies, YouTube, and mtvl in the college classroom. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 1-21.
Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). New York: Pearson Education.
Burke, S. C., & Snyder, S. L. (2008). YouTube: An inovative learning
Celce-Murcia, M. (2001). Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed.). Heinle & Heinle,
Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 354–380.
Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing and research. Cambridge University Press. Comrie, B. (1985). Tense. Cambridge University Press.
Creswell J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dabbagh, N., & Bannan-Ritland, B. (2005). Online learning: Concepts, strategies, and application. Pearson/MerrillPrentice Hall.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
Elis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
Gardner,; R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning, The role of attitudes and motivation. Edward Arnold.
Garison, D. R. (1997). Self-directed learning. Toward comprehensive model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(1), 18-33. 74/115
Krashen, S. (1982). Affective filter hypothesis.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2003). Three interconnected dimensions of grammar: Form, meaning, and use.
Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Contextualized grammar acquisition.
